Aggro

[fukyu]

Maybe he just has a problem with the poster and not the gender/sex/pronoun or however you want to describe them/there/him/her.Deconstructing someone's post is not "sinister" if you think they are wrong, what is sinister is someone saying you are because they don't agree with what you post.

[Blott]

Maybe he just has a problem with the poster and not the gender/sex/pronoun or however you want to describe them/there/him/her.Deconstructing someone's post is not "sinister" if you think they are wrong, what is sinister is someone saying you are because they don't agree with what you post.

it is sinister, it's very odd behaviour. Someone highlighted the number of recent posts he attacks women verbally. It's been happening for years.

It's wrong.

[Blott]

I think he is best avoided. There is something sinister and deep about his hatred.

Even better to avoid some creepy guy who finagles his way into women's confidence for his own nefarious intent.

finagles and nefarious, not bad, straight out of the VW Motorhome 1997 edition handbook.

[Hound]

Maybe he just has a problem with the poster and not the gender/sex/pronoun or however you want to describe them/there/him/her.Deconstructing someone's post is not "sinister" if you think they are wrong, what is sinister is someone saying you are because they don't agree with what you post.

So 37 of last 40 posts about her is not sinister?
It's blatantly weird,
Start taking stuff on a message board that serious, then it's time to step away from the keyboard.

[BoroRedKen]

HAND GRENADE ALERT!!!!!!


Because i have benefited from not being on here as much lately i have appointed SG as a permanent moderator.

Have i finally found the heir apparent to my role on RedRoar.Online??............

  
 

[Hound]

Flounce alert!!!

[fukyu]

Maybe he just has a problem with the poster and not the gender/sex/pronoun or however you want to describe them/there/him/her.Deconstructing someone's post is not "sinister" if you think they are wrong, what is sinister is someone saying you are because they don't agree with what you post.

So 37 of last 40 posts about her is not sinister?
It's blatantly weird,
Start taking stuff on a message board that serious, then it's time to step away from the keyboard.

As I said it maybe a personal dislike not a misogynist one.I get followed around by the board idiot who ramblings on about camper vans trying to get a bite.

[Hound]

Maybe he just has a problem with the poster and not the gender/sex/pronoun or however you want to describe them/there/him/her.Deconstructing someone's post is not "sinister" if you think they are wrong, what is sinister is someone saying you are because they don't agree with what you post.

So 37 of last 40 posts about her is not sinister?
It's blatantly weird,
Start taking stuff on a message board that serious, then it's time to step away from the keyboard.

As I said it maybe a personal dislike not a misogynist one.I get followed around by the board idiot who ramblings on about camper vans trying to get a bite.

Reading his posts it's clearly a misogynistic view,
Majority of the posts mention the fact he's annoyed that a "false accuser" is a woman and been moderator.
I see the ramblings you refer to, but you don't start every post ranting about him being a false accuser,
Like I said, if ya can't take a bit of name calling it's time to log out, FFS, there's posters on here get called nonces and rats.

[Blott]

Maybe he just has a problem with the poster and not the gender/sex/pronoun or however you want to describe them/there/him/her.Deconstructing someone's post is not "sinister" if you think they are wrong, what is sinister is someone saying you are because they don't agree with what you post.

So 37 of last 40 posts about her is not sinister?
It's blatantly weird,
Start taking stuff on a message board that serious, then it's time to step away from the keyboard.

As I said it maybe a personal dislike not a misogynist one.I get followed around by the board idiot who ramblings on about camper vans trying to get a bite.

it is nothing to do with the lady. Read his messages over the last 2 years. They are all the same, a sinister view on women.


Incidentally remold tyres at A66, you don't want to waste army money on new ones.

[fukyu]

Maybe he just has a problem with the poster and not the gender/sex/pronoun or however you want to describe them/there/him/her.Deconstructing someone's post is not "sinister" if you think they are wrong, what is sinister is someone saying you are because they don't agree with what you post.

So 37 of last 40 posts about her is not sinister?
It's blatantly weird,
Start taking stuff on a message board that serious, then it's time to step away from the keyboard.

As I said it maybe a personal dislike not a misogynist one.I get followed around by the board idiot who ramblings on about camper vans trying to get a bite.

Reading his posts it's clearly a misogynistic view,
Majority of the posts mention the fact he's annoyed that a "false accuser" is a woman and been moderator.
I see the ramblings you refer to, but you don't start every post ranting about him being a false accuser,
Like I said, if ya can't take a bit of name calling it's time to log out, FFS, there's posters on here get called nonces and rats.

The nonce posts were a misunderstanding and apologised for and stopped. The rats is a long running feud based on suspicions about a poster who maybe two people.Never counted posts myself but the recipient of them done herself no favours throwing accusations and insults around of her own in a bad tempered way.The fact of the matter is not everyone can like everyone and some are open about their dislike.Peace out( in case you think I'm being argumentative  for the sake of it.)

[BoroRedKen]

Good post Coulbs.

 

[BoroRedKen]

The last bit i meant.

Personalities clash.

[Blott]

The issue is not the young lady, it about his continuing anti women threads and messages, I questioned him a few times on it.


It's not nice, it's uncalled for, it's deep and sinister.


I have no idea where his attitude has come from but it is unacceptable.

[spottygiraffe (Moderator)]

It's more than just a clash of personalities though. I've explained myself 100x yet he's still going with his tirade against me.

To the point I'm hardly commenting on anything, yet he still feels the need to go on about me.

I haven't conducted myself any differently to anyone else on this board, have partaken in heated discussions, and got along with everyone too.

Blatant misogyny. The fact that other people are pointing it out too says it all.

[fukyu]

It's more than just a clash of personalities though. I've explained myself 100x yet he's still going with his tirade against me.

To the point I'm hardly commenting on anything, yet he still feels the need to go on about me.

I haven't conducted myself any differently to anyone else on this board, have partaken in heated discussions, and got along with everyone too.

Blatant misogyny. The fact that other people are pointing it out too says it all.

Or blatant dislike?, You didn't have a great start on here,you called clem a wife beater, said someone else was an incel, not everything or everyone has to have a label just because they argue against you,sometimes it's just a personal thing.

[Blott]

It's more than just a clash of personalities though. I've explained myself 100x yet he's still going with his tirade against me.

To the point I'm hardly commenting on anything, yet he still feels the need to go on about me.

I haven't conducted myself any differently to anyone else on this board, have partaken in heated discussions, and got along with everyone too.

Blatant misogyny. The fact that other people are pointing it out too says it all.

Or blatant dislike?, You didn't have a great start on here,you called clem a wife beater, said someone else was an incel, not everything or everyone has to have a label just because they argue against you,sometimes it's just a personal thing.

what was his issue with women before this lady turned up?

[tunstall]

Maybe he just doesn't like bewers?

[rutters]

Could anyone with any wherewithal give an example of an 'anti-women' thread or post?

Just one will do. (obviously excludes blott and his desperate quest for female approval)

So welcome to your new world of a RadFem Mod who's very relaxed about calling men 'Wife Beater', 'Claire's Law' candidate and 'Misogynist' for having the gall to disagree with her.

Oh, and any dissent will be harshly dealt with (just like fmttm and TwoTierKeir).

[Blott]

Chips on shoulders are proving very effective for women's health provision, for fucks sake.

[rutters]

Calm down and have another go. That one didn't really make sense.

[Ayton Mews]

You do seem to a bit obsessed like. And I only went through 2 pages of your posts. I got bored after that

Wonder why women don't establish their own football association to independently fund the women's game?

Wonder why men pay for their own gynocentric indoctrination?

Then you must be very upset that there's only a daily Woman's Hour advocating for women and that every BBC political show is fronted by a Feminist.

Not very equal or even equitable.

For those of you who are keen on women's sports, the BBC are currently going a bundle on Women's Netball...but strangely not Men's.

LIFE!!

Rachel Reeves thinks she's being bullied because she's a women.

I find it offensive that when Wayne Couzens killed one women he was evil, his court case was covered wall-to-wall, it was evidence of 'toxic masculinity' all male officers should be re-vetted, no woman can trust any Policeman, Police must prioritise Violence Against Women & Girls, we must have more Policewomen, men must call out other men, the entire Force is institutionally misogynistic', defund the Police.

When Letby kills 7 babies and tries to kill 10 more, she must have 'issues'.

aka 'The Gender Justice Gap'

Can anyone seriously tell me a man who assaulted Police four times, sexually harassed and racial abused wouldn't serve jail time?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12418033/Mother-three-spared-jail-FOURTH-time-attacking-police.html

Makes you wonder why so many men see the advantages of identifying as women.

Just look what female privilege did to Birmingham Council.

Feminism can be very expensive.

Tired of hearing women (and their male co-conspirators) saying we shouldn't compare them to the men's game...then comparing themselves to the men's game.

Why don't they stop whining and set up their own association instead of leeching off the men's association?

Why not set up their own clubs instead of shaming clubs into running a Ladies team?

They'd be a lot poorer but with a lot less to complain about.

[Blott]

Calm down and have another go. That one didn't really make sense.

you wrote it.


But I regret getting involved today. My view of you is simple. You are Dark with some very dangerous traits.

[rutters]

You must have missed the point.

Not one of those is 'anti-women'. Every single one is advocating for treating men and women equally.

If you think treating men & women equally is 'anti-women' then you're as inadequate as I think you are.

Have a little think and try again.

[Ayton Mews]

Either his mummy didn't hug him enough as a kid, or his mrs left him for a guardian reading lefty doyle

[spottygiraffe (Moderator)]

Crikey @Ayton Mews its actually scary to read.