Favoritism?

[Ural Quntz]

COB had too many troll wankers and Goldby lost interest when he was driving for Asda..

Every day became like yesterday on here.......

[BoroRedKen]

Not really.

Steve banned Lids when it should of been Bernie.

Im a loyal mate. I stick by them even when they turn on me. Just my nature.

We all have private stuff going on and mates should be able to let off steam etc with each other.
But they should also stick together when the chips are down.
I know my mates would for me if i needed them to.

[Ural Quntz]

Yeah that Bernie thing was proper nasty like

Still don't know who the cunt was do we?

Remember Goldby and his bulldozers?

Sit down Matty - nobodies having a go at you (yet)

[Ayton Mews]

[RiversideRifle]

Yeah that Bernie thing was proper nasty like

Still don't know who the cunt was do we?

Remember Goldby and his bulldozers?

Sit down Matty - nobodies having a go at you (yet)

I remember it was all a bit nasty. Lidds found out who he was didn't he and started threatening to go to his house and go to his work and stuff

[Gingerpig]

What a load of bollocks.

If i was making money from this place then of course the biggest content generators would be "looked after". Just look elsewhere.

But what i shall do is shut this place at 12pm tonight for 12/24 hours to give EVERYBODY the chance to chill out.

Consider every member "naughty stepped".

Its the same shite just a different day.

"Take a break Ken" "Go on holiday Ken" "Chill out Ken".
Not a fucking chance!

SG arrived at the right time for RR.
A fresh pair of eyes and a female to boot.
If you want RR to survive the SM shitstorm and the prying eyes of the law etc then you all must see the reasoning behind this "clampdown" on certain things.

Don't blame you closing it down for a breather ken. Some right ungrateful fuckers on here, and while I'm on my horse, a good few shit stirrers also. These individuals seriously need to take stock and have a good look at themselves, and what they contribute to the board, because all I see are lurking trolls, ready to pounce on posters they don't like. Contribute next to fuck all themselves, other than to spit their poison the first chance they get.
There is next to zero gratitude for the free services that are provided to them, and the freedom to talk within the laws of the land, regardless if we agree with current govt or not. I'm not going anywhere, but I can understand why posters are leaving and or losing interest. If you don't like the board fuck off, if you want to turn this place into a lefty cesspit, you can fuck off, if you are only here to wind people up with trolling, you can fuck off!

Well said sir  :carrick2:

[Steboro]

Again Spotty giraffe has proper freshened the place up. She's a daft cunt who cooks shit scoff mind but she's sound 👍👍👍👍👍

Has she posted a food thread with pictures like?

[spottygiraffe (Moderator)]

Again Spotty giraffe has proper freshened the place up. She's a daft cunt who cooks shit scoff mind but she's sound 👍👍👍👍👍

Has she posted a food thread with pictures like?

Yeah the what's for tea thread 🔥

[Steboro]

Yeah that Bernie thing was proper nasty like

Still don't know who the cunt was do we?

Remember Goldby and his bulldozers?

Sit down Matty - nobodies having a go at you (yet)

I remember it was all a bit nasty. Lidds found out who he was didn't he and started threatening to go to his house and go to his work and stuff

Yep I remember that as well was bizarre really that it escalated that much.

I'm alright over here I think I've only got Clem to worry about chapping on my door.  😂

[Clem Fandango]

Yep I remember that as well was bizarre really that it escalated that much.

I'm alright over here I think I've only got Clem to worry about chapping on my door.  😂

[tonyangelino]

There's a documentary coming out next week about him ☝🏻.

[fukyu]

Not really.

Steve banned Lids when it should of been Bernie.

Im a loyal mate. I stick by them even when they turn on me. Just my nature.

We all have private stuff going on and mates should be able to let off steam etc with each other.
But they should also stick together when the chips are down.
I know my mates would for me if i needed them to.

Bernie said nothing wrong he expressed an opinion on a particular situation. For some reason it went viral and that was the  Catalyst for Steve Goldby to act as he did.

[Reidydog]

Wow, I have a day out in Whitby and come back to World War 3!

[NIBZ]

What a load of bollocks.

If i was making money from this place then of course the biggest content generators would be "looked after". Just look elsewhere.

But what i shall do is shut this place at 12pm tonight for 12/24 hours to give EVERYBODY the chance to chill out.

Consider every member "naughty stepped".

Its the same shite just a different day.

"Take a break Ken" "Go on holiday Ken" "Chill out Ken".
Not a fucking chance!

SG arrived at the right time for RR.
A fresh pair of eyes and a female to boot.
If you want RR to survive the SM shitstorm and the prying eyes of the law etc then you all must see the reasoning behind this "clampdown" on certain things.

Look who posted under your original post. There's your answer. Ban em. I know Matti's sniggling away. Ban him also. If I had a thorn in my foot, guess what I'd do? Its only because these cunts know we can look after ourselves they get away with it.

[rutters]

Did you not understand the research then? #slow

Thanks for the 9 year old article, must be a real cause for concern!

The'research' by the OU Feminist (with 391 X followers) claims that only 4% of False Allegations are actually false so by this criteria less than 1% of reported rapes actually happened. She even states herself that most false allegations are dismissed as 'no crimes' therefore not recorded as any particular category of crime.

The article was to demonstrate that even admitted false allegations aren't charged. For your claim to have any equivalence you'd have to show me an example of a man who, having admitted rape, wasn't charged or prosecuted and remained anonymous.

My original point remains: you are a false accuser and are entrusted to moderate a forum on which you made the false accusation.

#StillaFalseAccuser

[ZiEgE]

Did you not understand the research then? #slow

Thanks for the 9 year old article, must be a real cause for concern!

The'research' by the OU Feminist (with 391 X followers) claims that only 4% of False Allegations are actually false so by this criteria less than 1% of reported rapes actually happened. She even states herself that most false allegations are dismissed as 'no crimes' therefore not recorded as any particular category of crime.

The article was to demonstrate that even admitted false allegations aren't charged. For your claim to have any equivalence you'd have to show me an example of a man who, having admitted rape, wasn't charged or prosecuted and remained anonymous.

My original point remains: you are a false accuser and are entrusted to moderate a forum on which you made the false accusation.

#StillaFalseAccuser

Kind of what I was getting at on the other thread.
They can say only 4% of accusations are false because they'll accept a women regretting having sex with a man as a rape. Or a woman getting drunk and not remembering if she consented as rape.

The real number will undoubtedly be much higher.

But all that said, it doesn't devalue or discredit that real sexual predators are out there and must face justice.

[BoroRedKen]

What a load of bollocks.

If i was making money from this place then of course the biggest content generators would be "looked after". Just look elsewhere.

But what i shall do is shut this place at 12pm tonight for 12/24 hours to give EVERYBODY the chance to chill out.

Consider every member "naughty stepped".

Its the same shite just a different day.

"Take a break Ken" "Go on holiday Ken" "Chill out Ken".
Not a fucking chance!

SG arrived at the right time for RR.
A fresh pair of eyes and a female to boot.
If you want RR to survive the SM shitstorm and the prying eyes of the law etc then you all must see the reasoning behind this "clampdown" on certain things.

Look who posted under your original post. There's your answer. Ban em. I know Matti's sniggling away. Ban him also. If I had a thorn in my foot, guess what I'd do? Its only because these cunts know we can look after ourselves they get away with it.

Banning aint my style Nibz.

Calling each other names dont really bother me and i know the majority of you lot dont really give 2 shineys about it.

But the law states if it "COULD" cause offence.
And therein lies the problem of a public forum.

Its now what "others" read on here that causes the most crap. It gives my "detractors" an open goal.
That is what im trying to say to people on here.
Dont give "others" the ammo.

[spottygiraffe (Moderator)]

Did you not understand the research then? #slow

Thanks for the 9 year old article, must be a real cause for concern!

The'research' by the OU Feminist (with 391 X followers) claims that only 4% of False Allegations are actually false so by this criteria less than 1% of reported rapes actually happened. She even states herself that most false allegations are dismissed as 'no crimes' therefore not recorded as any particular category of crime.

The article was to demonstrate that even admitted false allegations aren't charged. For your claim to have any equivalence you'd have to show me an example of a man who, having admitted rape, wasn't charged or prosecuted and remained anonymous.

My original point remains: you are a false accuser and are entrusted to moderate a forum on which you made the false accusation.

#StillaFalseAccuser

Kind of what I was getting at on the other thread.
They can say only 4% of accusations are false because they'll accept a women regretting having sex with a man as a rape. Or a woman getting drunk and not remembering if she consented as rape.

The real number will undoubtedly be much higher.

But all that said, it doesn't devalue or discredit that real sexual predators are out there and must face justice.

What about the vast numbers of rapes that go unreported? Or the ones that can't be proven?

The bottom line is, false reporting of rape is less of an issue than actual rape.

[rutters]

You're doing it again. If they are unreported or unproven then they are not 'rapes', they are 'alleged rapes. And as you have so ably demonstrated, some despicable women find false allegations frighteningly easy to make.

The actual bottom line outside of your misandrous hatepool is that until accuser and accused are treated equally and false allegations are investigated with equal rigour to rape allegations then we'll never know the true extent of either.

Until that time you'll just have to console yourself in the knowledge that in the UK you can rape as much as you desire with total impunity.

#StillaFalseAccuser

[fukyu]

Did you not understand the research then? #slow

Thanks for the 9 year old article, must be a real cause for concern!

The'research' by the OU Feminist (with 391 X followers) claims that only 4% of False Allegations are actually false so by this criteria less than 1% of reported rapes actually happened. She even states herself that most false allegations are dismissed as 'no crimes' therefore not recorded as any particular category of crime.

The article was to demonstrate that even admitted false allegations aren't charged. For your claim to have any equivalence you'd have to show me an example of a man who, having admitted rape, wasn't charged or prosecuted and remained anonymous.

My original point remains: you are a false accuser and are entrusted to moderate a forum on which you made the false accusation.

#StillaFalseAccuser

Kind of what I was getting at on the other thread.
They can say only 4% of accusations are false because they'll accept a women regretting having sex with a man as a rape. Or a woman getting drunk and not remembering if she consented as rape.

The real number will undoubtedly be much higher.

But all that said, it doesn't devalue or discredit that real sexual predators are out there and must face justice.

What about the vast numbers of rapes that go unreported? Or the ones that can't be proven?

The bottom line is, false reporting of rape is less of an issue than actual rape.

It's not less of an issue to men who have been falsely accused and jailed.Don't let your anger cloud your judgement just because the figures are disproportionate,rape and false accusations are just as bad as each other.False rape has two victims, the accused and women who maybe disbelieved in future because of it.

[spottygiraffe (Moderator)]

"Don't let your anger cloud your judgement" feels slightly patronising to be honest. My judgement absolutely isn't clouded.

In my opinion, being raped is absolutely worse than being accused of being a rapist. Not saying it isn't absolutely horrific to be accused of rape if you haven't done anything, I'm sure it is.

When I say rape is more of an issue, I mean the number of people being raped vs. The number of people being falsely accused.

But you should be more worried about men raping than women false reporting.

You are clearly more emotionally invested in false reporting as you probably think you have more chance of being falsely accused than being raped, but statistically it's the other way around.

I bet you think Mason Greenwood was innocent as well because he didn't get found guilty?

[fukyu]

"Don't let your anger cloud your judgement" feels slightly patronising to be honest. My judgement absolutely isn't clouded.

In my opinion, being raped is absolutely worse than being accused of being a rapist. Not saying it isn't absolutely horrific to be accused of rape if you haven't done anything, I'm sure it is.

When I say rape is more of an issue, I mean the number of people being raped vs. The number of people being falsely accused.

But you should be more worried about men raping than women false reporting.

You are clearly more emotionally invested in false reporting as you probably think you have more chance of being falsely accused than being raped, but statistically it's the other way around.

I bet you think Mason Greenwood was innocent as well because he didn't get found guilty?

I'm not emotionally involved in anything but you clearly are. I think my post was self explanatory and reasoned. As regarding mason greenwood you'd lose your " bet".

[spottygiraffe (Moderator)]

You are emotionally involved though as you respond to almost everything I say regarding this issue.

A lot can be said for men who go out of their way to argue that rape isn't as bad as being falsely accused of rape, and violence against women and girls isn't an issue. Strange hill to die on if you ask me.

You lot cry about "what aboutism" but any time I bring up violence against women: "WHAT ABOUT MEN!" I mention rape "WHAT ABOUT MEN WHO ARE FALSELY ACCUSED!" It's embarrassing.

[fukyu]

You are emotionally involved though as you respond to almost everything I say regarding this issue.

A lot can be said for men who go out of their way to argue that rape isn't as bad as being falsely accused of rape, and violence against women and girls isn't an issue. Strange hill to die on if you ask me.

You lot cry about "what aboutism" but any time I bring up violence against women: "WHAT ABOUT MEN!" I mention rape "WHAT ABOUT MEN WHO ARE FALSELY ACCUSED!" It's embarrassing.

I think you need to re-asses my posts, I've barely posted on the issues.I never said one was worse than the other, to the people involved they are equally as bad and both are despicable. As I stated on my last post I gave a reasoned and fair assessment yet you persist with this " with me or against me" mentality.

[ZiEgE]

quote author=spottygiraffe (Moderator) link=msg=177332 date=1724619068]
What about the vast numbers of rapes that go unreported? Or the ones that can't be proven?

The bottom line is, false reporting of rape is less of an issue than actual rape.

I don't understand your point.

We cannot "believe all women" for the exact same reason we cannot "believe all men".

People lie.

You seem to be suggesting that because there are fewer false accusations rather than actual rapes that we should forgo judge and jury and just put men in jail based on a single accusation.

That's preposterous.