Inside the Kremlin?

[ZiEgE]

Ziege and lurpak are defo the same bloke

Did you get that from your 12 daily trips to this site?

Columbo ain't got shit on you.

[In With the Lurpak]

NIGER

IS

NOT

NIGERIA


THICK AS A 4 X 4 PLANK YOU KUNTZ


Delete the thread like I told you to ages ago you're a clown.

Silly cunt - ordering your superiors about isn't smart

A Wood louse is more superior than you Mike.

Niger is not Nigeria 


delete your full account you're a complete joke.     

[In With the Lurpak]

Never mind inside the Kremlin


This brainless sack of NAFO Shite from America just got 7 years inside the Gulag     

72 years old as well.. LMFAO               


https://twitter.com/runews/status/1843217733137097122

[Ural Quntz]

Double post spacker fucks up - again!



See latest news in Inside the Krem post just updated

Exclusive news!!

[Ural Quntz]

Dear subscribers and guests of the channel!

The man appointed by the President of Russia and similar to yesterday's birthday boy Vladimir Putin is sent to Ashgabat, where an urgent meeting with the President of Iran was organized.

As we said, the Iranian leadership imposed a ban on Russia to use most of the weapons that Tehran provided for the war with Ukraine. This happened against the backdrop of increased tensions between Iran and Israel, when Tehran, in response to the destruction of almost the entire top leadership of the Hezbollah organization, attempted to launch a massive missile strike on Israeli territory.

The Russian leadership almost immediately decided that personal contact between "Putin" and the President of Iran was necessary to lift the restrictions. The problem is that in Iran, although the position of the current president is significant, he does not make major decisions of this kind personally.

Moreover, the Iranian leadership is well aware that Putin is being portrayed by a double and treats contacts with him with a certain degree of skepticism. The chances that the stand-in's meeting with the Iranian president in Turkmenistan will bring any results are close to zero.

But the Russian leadership considers it necessary to use this attempt. The prospect of capturing significant territories of Ukraine's Donetsk region and liberating the Kursk region has only just appeared at the front, while Iran's ban on the use of weapons makes the implementation of these plans very problematic.

It's high time for the Russian leadership to write a book called "What is Bad Luck?"

[TerryCochranesSocks]

Vuhledar captured by the Russians last week, Toretsk today. Slowly but surely they're taking Donetsk.
It will be a long and difficult fight through tank trenches and urban sprawl. This is good news for the money people profiting from this macabre puppet show.

[Ural Quntz]

Vuhledar captured by the Russians last week, Toretsk today. Slowly but surely they're taking Donetsk.
It will be a long and difficult fight through tank trenches and urban sprawl. This is good news for the money people profiting from this macabre puppet show.

They've done well - only took them 2.5 years and the loss of double the number of people that lived there (14K) which is the same size as Guisborough. Oh and 180 tanks

Good work....for the 2nd best army in the world

[TerryCochranesSocks]

A combined population of 45,000 (Vuhledar and Toretsk) just to be accurate, but it is the strategic relevance of Toretsk which is more important.

"Ukrainian military analysts warn that if Toretsk, which sits on elevated terrain, were to fall, Moscow could block Ukrainian supply routes to the front line."

[Ural Quntz]

A combined population of 45,000 (Vuhledar and Toretsk) just to be accurate, but it is the strategic relevance of Toretsk which is more important.

"Ukrainian military analysts warn that if Toretsk, which sits on elevated terrain, were to fall, Moscow could block Ukrainian supply routes to the front line."

OK you're changing your argument.

Add another 1K into the dead Ruzzian and they only just started and have got nowhere

Here's a view from somebody thats not as daft/ill informed as you

The Institute for the Study of War has repeatedly analyzed and predicted that Russian forces will not be able to make substantial gains in the direction of Toretsk, both due to a lack of committed forces to the offensive and the wide area of responsibility of the Central Military District, stretching from offensive manoeuvres southwest of Donetsk to Toretsk, which they claim causes a lack of rapid offensive gains in any of the covered areas

Rope a dope by the UKR works well

....and in here as well its seems

[TerryCochranesSocks]

OK you're changing your argument.

Add another 1K into the dead Ruzzian and they only just started and have got nowhere

Here's a view from somebody thats not as daft/ill informed as you

The Institute for the Study of War has repeatedly analyzed and predicted that Russian forces will not be able to make substantial gains in the direction of Toretsk, both due to a lack of committed forces to the offensive and the wide area of responsibility of the Central Military District, stretching from offensive manoeuvres southwest of Donetsk to Toretsk, which they claim causes a lack of rapid offensive gains in any of the covered areas

Rope a dope by the UKR works well

....and in here as well its seems

How am I "changing my argument"?

You've done enormously well managing to find something on Wikipedia to refute the facts but Russian forces are already in east Toretsk.

You can read about it here -
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/08/world/europe/russia-eastern-ukraine-toretsk.html


Just a side note - there is nothing remotely funny about this conflict, people are dying on both sides, your continued use of a "laughing Ray" when you desperately try to provide positive news, however fake, for the child traffickers is, I think, in poor taste.

[fukyu]

How anyone can defend Russia attacking Ukraine what ever  the pretence is wrong.Putin is a pound shop Stalin that has ruined his country and wrought havoc on another.I fear for the Ukraine if trump gets in, another fucking megalomaniac.

[TerryCochranesSocks]

I'm certainly not defending Russia attacking Ukraine but it doesn't mean that we can't look at the reasons why they did and who is pulling the strings to make it happen in the first place and to ensure it continues ad infinitum.

I hope that Trump gets in and stops the constant flow of US dollars into Ukraine, I believe he could be the man to broker some sort of devolution based peace.

[fukyu]

Putin had no reason to invade Ukraine other than the fact he wanted to, anything else is unjustifiable rubbish.It's no coincidence that so many former soviet east European countries joined NATO and now the Baltic states, Finland and Sweden have jumped in.Stopping arms to Ukraine is handing it to Putin.Appeasement doesn't work.

[Ural Quntz]

I'm certainly not defending Russia attacking Ukraine but it doesn't mean that we can't look at the reasons why they did and who is pulling the strings to make it happen in the first place and to ensure it continues ad infinitum.

I hope that Trump gets in and stops the constant flow of US dollars into Ukraine, I believe he could be the man to broker some sort of devolution based peace.

[TerryCochranesSocks]

I'm certainly not defending Russia attacking Ukraine but it doesn't mean that we can't look at the reasons why they did and who is pulling the strings to make it happen in the first place and to ensure it continues ad infinitum.

I hope that Trump gets in and stops the constant flow of US dollars into Ukraine, I believe he could be the man to broker some sort of devolution based peace.

"The Institute for the Study of War has repeatedly analyzed and predicted that Russian forces will not be able to make substantial gains in the direction of Toretsk"

How's this working out then laughing boy?

Some sort of negotiation needs to happen because at the rate that Ukraine are running out of lives to sacrifice, battlefield casualties and desertion on a huge scale is depleting numbers fast. What a sad situation we seem intent on perpetuating.

[Redsteel (Moderator)]

Putin had no reason to invade Ukraine other than the fact he wanted to, anything else is unjustifiable rubbish.It's no coincidence that so many former soviet east European countries joined NATO and now the Baltic states, Finland and Sweden have jumped in.Stopping arms to Ukraine is handing it to Putin.Appeasement doesn't work.

What absolute horse plop. May as well say Kennedy in 62 was wrong for bumping his gums, when the Russians wanted to load up Cuba with Tactical Nuclear Weapons. Exactly what NATO will and want to do if Ukraine became members.

[Ural Quntz]

I'm certainly not defending Russia attacking Ukraine but it doesn't mean that we can't look at the reasons why they did and who is pulling the strings to make it happen in the first place and to ensure it continues ad infinitum.

I hope that Trump gets in and stops the constant flow of US dollars into Ukraine, I believe he could be the man to broker some sort of devolution based peace.

"The Institute for the Study of War has repeatedly analyzed and predicted that Russian forces will not be able to make substantial gains in the direction of Toretsk"

How's this working out then laughing boy?

Some sort of negotiation needs to happen because at the rate that Ukraine are running out of lives to sacrifice, battlefield casualties and desertion on a huge scale is depleting numbers fast. What a sad situation we seem intent on perpetuating.

Suddenly you're an expert - but now a bit sensitive to 'hurty' memes

[TerryCochranesSocks]

No, not an expert just someone capable of reading and thinking.
Give it a whirl daf cun.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/08/europe/ukraine-military-morale-desertion-intl-cmd/index.html

[Ural Quntz]

Who wrote this?

Oh I see - a Russian plant. Fed in from Czech republic

https://edition.cnn.com/profiles/ivana-kottasova

You keep falling for Ruzzian lies

 

[TerryCochranesSocks]

Fuck me you're thicker than I thought!

 

[fukyu]

Putin had no reason to invade Ukraine other than the fact he wanted to, anything else is unjustifiable rubbish.It's no coincidence that so many former soviet east European countries joined NATO and now the Baltic states, Finland and Sweden have jumped in.Stopping arms to Ukraine is handing it to Putin.Appeasement doesn't work.

What absolute horse plop. May as well say Kennedy in 62 was wrong for bumping his gums, when the Russians wanted to load up Cuba with Tactical Nuclear Weapons. Exactly what NATO will and want to do if Ukraine became members.

It's always useful to explain why you think something is wrong rather than just dismiss it. Russia has nuclear capability and a large military. They had nothing to fear from invasion. It's all down to Putin's paranoia and megalomania. He laments the fall of the Soviet empire and wants it back.The mistake Khrushchev made was trying to sneak nuclear missiles into Cuba,he should have announced a defence treaty and the yanks would have been fucked,instead he tried to sneak them in and lost the legitimate high ground.

[Redsteel (Moderator)]

Putin had no reason to invade Ukraine other than the fact he wanted to, anything else is unjustifiable rubbish.It's no coincidence that so many former soviet east European countries joined NATO and now the Baltic states, Finland and Sweden have jumped in.Stopping arms to Ukraine is handing it to Putin.Appeasement doesn't work.

What absolute horse plop. May as well say Kennedy in 62 was wrong for bumping his gums, when the Russians wanted to load up Cuba with Tactical Nuclear Weapons. Exactly what NATO will and want to do if Ukraine became members.

It's always useful to explain why you think something is wrong rather than just dismiss it. Russia has nuclear capability and a large military. They had nothing to fear from invasion. It's all down to Putin's paranoia and megalomania. He laments the fall of the Soviet empire and wants it back.The mistake Khrushchev made was trying to sneak nuclear missiles into Cuba,he should have announced a defence treaty and the yanks would have been fucked,instead he tried to sneak them in and lost the legitimate high ground.

Call Putin what you want, he is a headcase, I'm not disputing that fact. You said he invaded Ukraine for no reason, to which I gave you a reason. He was very clear for a number of years that, EU/NATO membership would not be tolerated because it gave the west tactical advantage. If we were mortal enemies with the Jocks, would we allow a foreign entity to arm them with nuclear missiles? Would we fuck.

[fukyu]

Putin had no reason to invade Ukraine other than the fact he wanted to, anything else is unjustifiable rubbish.It's no coincidence that so many former soviet east European countries joined NATO and now the Baltic states, Finland and Sweden have jumped in.Stopping arms to Ukraine is handing it to Putin.Appeasement doesn't work.

What absolute horse plop. May as well say Kennedy in 62 was wrong for bumping his gums, when the Russians wanted to load up Cuba with Tactical Nuclear Weapons. Exactly what NATO will and want to do if Ukraine became members.

It's always useful to explain why you think something is wrong rather than just dismiss it. Russia has nuclear capability and a large military. They had nothing to fear from invasion. It's all down to Putin's paranoia and megalomania. He laments the fall of the Soviet empire and wants it back.The mistake Khrushchev made was trying to sneak nuclear missiles into Cuba,he should have announced a defence treaty and the yanks would have been fucked,instead he tried to sneak them in and lost the legitimate high ground.

Call Putin what you want, he is a headcase, I'm not disputing that fact. You said he invaded Ukraine for no reason, to which I gave you a reason. He was very clear for a number of years that, EU/NATO membership would not be tolerated because it gave the west tactical advantage. If we were mortal enemies with the Jocks, would we allow a foreign entity to arm them with nuclear missiles? Would we fuck.

Your comparisons aren't really valid, and Putin has brought upon on Russia everything he feared by invading Ukraine. He did it because he thought he'd be in Kiev in a week and the west would accept it as a fait acompli. Now he has nato on his borders because of his actions not despite them.And the west had to put up with Russia troops and nuclear missiles in  East Germany for decades. He's a product of the Soviet system and he still thinks in those terms .

[Redsteel (Moderator)]

Putin had no reason to invade Ukraine other than the fact he wanted to, anything else is unjustifiable rubbish.It's no coincidence that so many former soviet east European countries joined NATO and now the Baltic states, Finland and Sweden have jumped in.Stopping arms to Ukraine is handing it to Putin.Appeasement doesn't work.

What absolute horse plop. May as well say Kennedy in 62 was wrong for bumping his gums, when the Russians wanted to load up Cuba with Tactical Nuclear Weapons. Exactly what NATO will and want to do if Ukraine became members.

It's always useful to explain why you think something is wrong rather than just dismiss it. Russia has nuclear capability and a large military. They had nothing to fear from invasion. It's all down to Putin's paranoia and megalomania. He laments the fall of the Soviet empire and wants it back.The mistake Khrushchev made was trying to sneak nuclear missiles into Cuba,he should have announced a defence treaty and the yanks would have been fucked,instead he tried to sneak them in and lost the legitimate high ground.

Call Putin what you want, he is a headcase, I'm not disputing that fact. You said he invaded Ukraine for no reason, to which I gave you a reason. He was very clear for a number of years that, EU/NATO membership would not be tolerated because it gave the west tactical advantage. If we were mortal enemies with the Jocks, would we allow a foreign entity to arm them with nuclear missiles? Would we fuck.

Your comparisons aren't really valid, and Putin has brought upon on Russia everything he feared by invading Ukraine. He did it because he thought he'd be in Kiev in a week and the west would accept it as a fait acompli. Now he has nato on his borders because of his actions not despite them.And the west had to put up with Russia troops and nuclear missiles in  East Germany for decades. He's a product of the Soviet system and he still thinks in those terms .

I've given you facts and reasons 

I'm not a Putin fan, far from it but the facts are there for the reason why he attacked. I just want this war to end so there's no more needless killing mate. Like or loath him, Trump if elected will stop the killing.

[fukyu]

Putin had no reason to invade Ukraine other than the fact he wanted to, anything else is unjustifiable rubbish.It's no coincidence that so many former soviet east European countries joined NATO and now the Baltic states, Finland and Sweden have jumped in.Stopping arms to Ukraine is handing it to Putin.Appeasement doesn't work.

What absolute horse plop. May as well say Kennedy in 62 was wrong for bumping his gums, when the Russians wanted to load up Cuba with Tactical Nuclear Weapons. Exactly what NATO will and want to do if Ukraine became members.

It's always useful to explain why you think something is wrong rather than just dismiss it. Russia has nuclear capability and a large military. They had nothing to fear from invasion. It's all down to Putin's paranoia and megalomania. He laments the fall of the Soviet empire and wants it back.The mistake Khrushchev made was trying to sneak nuclear missiles into Cuba,he should have announced a defence treaty and the yanks would have been fucked,instead he tried to sneak them in and lost the legitimate high ground.

Call Putin what you want, he is a headcase, I'm not disputing that fact. You said he invaded Ukraine for no reason, to which I gave you a reason. He was very clear for a number of years that, EU/NATO membership would not be tolerated because it gave the west tactical advantage. If we were mortal enemies with the Jocks, would we allow a foreign entity to arm them with nuclear missiles? Would we fuck.

Your comparisons aren't really valid, and Putin has brought upon on Russia everything he feared by invading Ukraine. He did it because he thought he'd be in Kiev in a week and the west would accept it as a fait acompli. Now he has nato on his borders because of his actions not despite them.And the west had to put up with Russia troops and nuclear missiles in  East Germany for decades. He's a product of the Soviet system and he still thinks in those terms .

I've given you facts and reasons 

I'm not a Putin fan, far from it but the facts are there for the reason why he attacked. I just want this war to end so there's no more needless killing mate. Like or loath him, Trump if elected will stop the killing.

No you gave an opinion.Will he attack the Baltic States or Poland they are NATO and have NATO troops stationed there.?,all trump will do is  withdraw support for the Ukraine if they don't concede land to Putin.This will encourage Putin further and confirm to him that the west is weak and will not stand up to him.There was the Budapest memorandum co signed by Russia in 1993 that Ukraine would be left alone for giving up it's nuclear stockpile. The killing will stop when Russia withdraws.