England vs Nigeria Birds

Started by Mike Peeler, August 07, 2023, 08:01:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mike Peeler

Last 16 knockout stage.

I've always fancied a bit of black in the sack - I'm not sure it will ever happen now like unless I do split from her indoors and get a roving eye again. So I will check for any black eye candy out on the pitch this morning. :christian:


Still going for an England lasses win this morning.

Single  @35/1

Lauren Hemp, England Women 3-1
First Goal Scorer, Correct Score / England Women v Nigeria Women

Single  @29/10

Georgia Stanway
Anytime Goalscorer / England Women v Nigeria Women


CMON THE BIRDS!


Francks left peg


Johnny Thunder


LIDDLE_TOWERS999

NEVER HEARD OF THE CUNTS 🙄😔🙄
GET WELL SOON STEVE G

BoroRedKen

Birds??????


Aw what the hell. Might as well add misogyny to the list!!





 :alf: 

BoroRedKen

Controversy alert!!


Should hair be allowed to cover the name and shirt number?


Mike Peeler

I thought using the word 'pussy' might have got me on the naughty step - so decided to stick with 'birds' instead.  :bigjack

Mike Peeler

#7
Quote from: Nekder (Kenny) on August 07, 2023, 10:03:25 AMControversy alert!!


Should hair be allowed to cover the name and shirt number?




A fairly good point but one that won't get mentioned as yet - anyone coming up with any kind of negativity in the public domain. media etc will be immediately shot down, lose their job, and be called something along the lines of an undesirable. It's all about the 'brand and so on!' at the moment in the 'women's' game. Woh betides anyone that says otherwise or question it. :rav: 

BoroRedKen

The Be kind and nice "message" just went right out of the window!!

The USA team lecturing people but refusing to sing the national anthem. That blatant stamp there from James.

Well and truly conned by all this "wokey" bollocks.

BoroRedKen

Equal rights and pay.

Equal criticism as the mens game gets then.

That was disgraceful that stamp.

Should get a ban for 7 games min.

Johnny Thunder

I wonder if she will receive the same treatment that Wilkins, Beckham and Rooney got from the press and public after the were sent off in finals tournaments?

Equality and all that.

Mike Peeler

#11
The will be no burning effigies of her - it will go down as a 'Klansman's' party if the is. She will escape what the 'men' went and go through when sent off in an England shirt. She ticks to many boxes to be getting stick. :rudi:

Even OTR will be holding their tounges and they are normally vicious bastards to anyone letting the 'shirt down' in football!


A good player on her day that has let herself and the supporting nation down by getting stupidly sent off

Redsteel (Moderator)

Quote from: Johnny Thunder on August 07, 2023, 10:30:07 AMI wonder if she will receive the same treatment that Wilkins, Beckham and Rooney got from the press and public after the were sent off in finals tournaments?

Equality and all that.

She can walk down any high street next week and 99.9% of the people that pass her won't have a clue who she is. The few losers  :rudi: who actually watch that shite will have forgotten all about it come tea time.

Mike Peeler

Whatever you may say about the Birds game - some decent penalty strikes from the English lasses - a couple of them can hit a dead ball better than some of the Boro players can.

rutters

Here's another controversial point...

If they don't want to feel undervalued, disrespected, compared, judged, told what shorts to wear, suffer misogyny, institutional sexism and criticism why don't they set up their own association instead of piggy-backing the men's game?

Clue: money

Here's another one...

If an inferior product producing less revenue and attracting a lesser audience is equally rewarded why are they surprised when average men identify as women to get in on the racket?

Clue: money

Last one...

If the BBC/ITV/Sky are hyping women's football because it needs to match men's coverage, why aren't they equally hyping men's netball?

Clue: feminism

Mike Peeler

Quote from: rutters on August 07, 2023, 11:50:48 AMHere's another controversial point...

If they don't want to feel undervalued, disrespected, compared, judged, told what shorts to wear, suffer misogyny, institutional sexism and criticism why don't they set up their own association instead of piggy-backing the men's game?

Clue: money

Here's another one...

If an inferior product producing less revenue and attracting a lesser audience is equally rewarded why are they surprised when average men identify as women to get in on the racket?

Clue: money

Last one...

If the BBC/ITV/Sky are hyping women's football because it needs to match men's coverage, why aren't they equally hyping men's netball?

Clue: feminism



Fucking hell - that will be next a couple of 'tranny' men going into the bird's team to bag a few million - I get what you are saying there rutters lad. You won't be wrong either - the fa will back it if it helps win them a trophy coming to womens team near you.  :rudi2:

BoroRedKen

I heard it was because someone was misgendered............

BoroRedKen

Its true!

Someone called 1 of them a human.........

Mike Peeler

It looks like James got a free pass for her sending off. I wonder why. FFS


They can be 'bitches' when they wanna be I see.

BoroRedKen

Quote from: Nekder (Kenny) on August 07, 2023, 08:54:58 PMI heard it was because someone was misgendered............

WRONG THREAD KENNY YOU BERK!!

 :alf:  :alf:

BoroRedKen

Quote from: Mike Peeler on August 08, 2023, 07:55:12 AMIt looks like James got a free pass for her sending off. I wonder why. FFS


They can be 'bitches' when they wanna be I see.
They can be 'bitches' when they wanna be I see.

OTR or female footballers???.....

 :cloughy:  :alf:  :alf: