POOR SCOTLAND

[BoroRedKen]

BUT..........

"The offences in section 127 are summary-only offences. This means that there is
currently a six-month time limit for prosecutions to be brought."



2 years and 4 months later.................................

[BoroRedKen]

I dont make the "law".........

[BoroRedKen]

"They" are trying to up the time limit to......

3 YEARS!

That means something you posted 3 years ago could mean a prosecution.

The JMV "smiley" would go into overdrive if that comes in.............

 

[rutters]

3 years would leave Emily McCombs at HuffPost safe.
https://www.inc.com/suzanne-lucas/huffpost-editor-says-new-years-resolution-is-to-kill-all-men.html

[Ural Quntz]

BUT..........

"The offences in section 127 are summary-only offences. This means that there is
currently a six-month time limit for prosecutions to be brought."



2 years and 4 months later.................................

It would be interesting to submit a Freedom of Information Act request to Cleveland Police asking for data on how many Section 127 cases they have that have been open for longer than the prescribed 6 month time limit?

 :ponder:

[Blott]

Who decides on the word 'grossly' ?

I have every digit crossed for you. 

[Blott]

I see the police have already said that they will not be arresting JK, although they had complaints.


Her wallet is bigger than theirs. And she would win.

[RiversideRifle]

Jocks are fucking wild like. It won't work there aren't enough popo as is never mind this shite

[rutters]

Great.... so that's brown people, Islamic people, gay people, trans people and now women protected from potentially upsetting words.


Now, let's see who that leaves who anyone can say anything they like to  :ponder: